
| Energy options | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Power
Station Hearing in September at There is an opportunity for the next few weeks, for submitters to make a further submission on matters raised by other submitters. Submissions on Genesis Energy’s Private Plan Change application to RDC for a “Thermal Energy Generation Zone” near the ruralThe
joint hearing of both the ARC and RDC planning consents and will take place at
the The
Commissioners’ recommendations, likely to be released in early 2009, will then
go to the ARC and RDC Councils for approval. At
the September hearing in Submitters may expand in more
detail on their original submission and can also include evidence from experts,
such as professional planning, hydrology, and environmental experts. Use of an advocate or lawyer
to help present a submission is recommended (by the Ministry for the
Environment), if the submission explores legal matters, or if a professional
interpretation of legislation or case law is needed. The Commissioners won’t necessarily
be experts in the planning matters being addressed and will want to hear good,
solid evidence to help them make a decision. Expert witnesses are
recommended (by MOE), if submitters need to present evidence about technical
topics. At a private plan change
hearing, the applicant is certain to use expert witnesses to support its case.
This means it makes sense for submitters to also use expert witnesses, such as
planning consultants, surveyors, engineers or scientists when they need to
present clear evidence opposing the application. Full-sized 480MW power station notified - submissions closed early May Despite earlier suggestions that it might down-size the proposal for a combined cycle gas-fired power station at Kaukapakapa, Genesis Energy has applied for consents to establish a full-time 480MW capacity power station at the site. The company intends to develop this in two stages of 240MW, but the outcome is the same. The proposed Rodney power station will become a full-time base load station, not the peaking supply station that the company claims it needs for this area. See following story. April 2008 Submission
and hearings process for power station “It’s also very important to
read the detail of the consents in the Genesis AEE and relate this to the
issues that affect you,” said “They are applying for
resource consents so that the full 480MW capacity can be used 24 hours a day,
seven days a week.”
White Elephant for Kaukapakapa Genesis Energy is proposing a white elephant for Kaukapakapa that will cost taxpayers about $500 million dollars. This would make a mockery of the Government's attempts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by banning new non-renewable generation. Security of supply is not a long term issue for north of -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kaukapakapa residents say no to burning gas Strong
opposition to proposed gas-turbine power station near Kaukapakapa was
expressed by many at the Kaipara energy forum in September 2007. Residents spoke of the likely
impacts of the proposal, including CO2 emissions, and discharges into
the Kaukapakapa River. Many were opposed to the use
of non-renewable fossil fuels when renewable options were available in
Rodney, and questioned the safety and use of imported LNG.
Others
questioned Mayor John Law’s support for the gas-fired power
station when many residents would prefer clean, green, environmental
options for power generation such as wind-turbines, tidal turbines or
solar power.
It was a very successful meeting with 92 people filling the Helensville Memorial Hall. Speakers included Malcolm Alexander for Genesis, Al Yates for Windpower NZ, Dr Anthony Bellve for Crest Energy, Jeanette Fitzsimons for energy conservation, Rodney Mayor John Law , and energy analyst, Murray Ellis. The meeting was facilitated by energy conservation expert, Dr Peter Phillips. "Renewable technologies are available now to enable the move away from fossil fuels," said Green Party co-leader and energy conservation spokesperson, Jeanette Fitzsimons. "There is no need to build more fossil fuel burning plants like the Genesis gas-fired turbine proposal,” she said. Using the gas-fired option would mean having to import LNG as gas resources are very limited in New Zealand. Importing LNG would mean supply is linked to the world fuel market, and this is a very costly and undesirable option." "No amount of building new power stations will solve the problem”, said Ms Fitzsimons. "A kilowatt saved is better than a kilowatt generated. We need to do use the energy we have much more efficiently, from energy efficient houses with more insulation, passive solar, solar panels and thermal mass storage, to more efficient motorcars," she said. "New Zealand, and especially Rodney, is very well endowed with renewable resources such as wind and sunshine and has the technology to make use of it. We should be increasing the amount of renewable generation and can increase this to 20% of the total supply – we are only at 2% now. Wood waste energy, ocean energy and solar energy were other options for increasing renewable generation,” said Ms Fitzsimons. Al Yates from Windfarm Group talked about the Poutoa wind farm proposed for South Head (south of Wilson Road) that will produce 5-34MW (depending on the wind), and operate 93 per cent of the time with no CO2 emissions. The $62 million project is proposed for the ridgeline north of Woodhill forest on South Head and is in one of the windiest sites in the Auckland region. "In terms of CO2 emissions, our windfarm is equivalent to putting 16,000 cars off the road, whereas a gas-fired turbine station is equivalent to adding an extra 16,000 cars. It has the benefit of giving extra stability to the grid and complements tidal power, he said. Crest Energy's Marine Turbine Tidal Power Proposal Crest Energy submitted their resource consent application in July 2006 for up to 200 tidal turbines to generate up to 200 MW of power at the Kaipara Heads. The turbines would be sited in 30 metres of water in the main channel near North Head. This is stated in the AEE to give a minimum clearance of five metres at mean low spring tides. The resource consent application seeks consents from Northland Regional Council for ‘non-complying’ structures, ‘permitted’ discharges to water, and ‘discretionary’ use and diversion of coastal water. These relate to coastal permits needed for erection of and occupation of the seabed by the tidal turbines, occupation of the seabed by cables, use of water to extract energy, disturbance of the seabed, and for discharge of heat emanating from generators and cables. Crest Energy proposes to undertake a range of activities in the Kaipara Harbour and on land near the Hoteo River. Resource consents sought from the Rodney District Council include those land use consents associated with the landfall of the transmission cable at the Hoteo River where they will connect to the National Grid. These activities include trenching for about 100 metres, possible removal of vegetation for the cable to shore crossing, and erection of a building during project construction. Although 2. Potential adverse environmental effects on marine mammals; 3. Potential adverse hydrodynamic effects on the Kaipara Harbour; and 4. Potential adverse effects on the natural character of the coastal environment The Branch submission which opposes the application can be downloaded from here ______________________________________________________________________________________Wind power proposals for South Head There are two proposals for wind turbine generation on South Head. Both of them are in early stages of planning. The first is the Poutoa windfarm south of Wilsons Road - a small-scale 17 turbine, 34 MW proposal by Windfarm Group. Spacing for the proposed turbines is 400-600m apart with slow rotating blades (9-17 rpm) and underground cabling. The total height of the turbines is proposed to be 118m. The tower height is 78 metres while the blade length is 40 metres. There is some potential for effects on wildlife including avifauna. Effects could include collision, disturbance and displacement, direct habitat loss and movement barrier to seabirds, wetland birds and migrating species. The proposers, Wind Farm Group Ltd. have not yet applied for a resource consent. For more information on the proposal contact Al Yates at Windfarm Group in Greenlane, Auckland. They have a website at www.windfarm.co.nz The second wind turbine generation proposal on South Head is still in the early stages of investigation and discussion with landowners. Mighty River Power are believed to be looking at this much larger proposal on Ngati Whatua land that is likely to generate up to 250 MW. There are also two proposals for wind generation on the North Head of the Kaipara. Meridian are in discussion with Te Uri o Hau over use of the Pouto Forest for wind generation, and Northpower are looking at a proposal for wind generation at Redhill on the western side of North Head. ______________________________________________________________________________________ Branch response The
Branch has made a submission on the Crest Energy proposal (click
here to download) and will actively monitor these proposals
and may make submissions when resource consent applications are lodged.
You may like to check back here to keep up with news on these
energy proposals.
|